I have lots of problems with the Talmud. It prohibits many things as Christians we do every day. The Talmud credits the Gentiles with three observations of the commandments given the sons of Noah: they do not drawup a marriage deed? (kethubah) for males; they do not weigh the flesh of the dead in a market; and they respect the Torah (Hullin 92b). The first of the three is as puzzling as the last. Homosexual marriages were well known in the Roman world, and most Jews were familiar with such aspects of Roman life. Two explanations seem likely: (1) the Talmud assumes that the absence of legal documents for such relationships demonstrates inferior status (ignoring the generally looser structure of all Gentile marriages); or (2) kethubah refers not to the legalization of the marriage but to a particular aspect of it, probably the dowry agreement (see, e.g. Maimonides, The Guide of The Perplexed, trans. M. Friedlander (New York, n.d.), 3:49).

In regard to Lev, the Jewish commentaries of Maimonides and others agree that the passages in Lev 18-20 are not moral values but as symbols of Jewish distinctiveness. Also Mishnah's regarded homosexuality as punishable with all other idolatrous or ritually impure behavior; as well as later by Maimonides, who specifically and repeatedly equated homosexual acts with matters like the hybridization of cattle, which had long since become morally indifferent in the Christian tradition. (See The Code of Maimonides, bk.5, The Book of Holiness, 21.8)

In the Lev passages it is also unclear what is being prohibited. The Hebrew reads literally, "You should not sleep the sleep of a women with a man." Jewish moralists have debated for a millennium about exactly what constitutes "the sleep of a women" and who is technically a "man": see e.g. in the Talmud, Sandedrin 7.4.53A; and Maimonides' commentary in Code 5.1.14. Moreover, since the actions of the "kadeshim" were specifically labeled as "toevah" (e.g., in 1 (3) Kings 14:24), one might well infer that the condemnation in Leviticus were in fact aimed at curbing temple prostitution in particular rather than homosexual behavior in general. This was not the usual understanding of the later Jewish tradition, but it is suggested by the LXX, upon which Christian moralists drew.

As a Christian however, while respecting the Jewish right to their views, I am much more interested in the New Testament view which more clearly says nothing about today's homosexual relationships.